December 31, 2007

[Dogs in the Vineyard] In the line of duty…. (Part 1 of 2)

Filed under: Dogs in the Vineyard Actual Play — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 5:06 pm

Introduction

There’s a man goin’ ’round takin’ names.
An’ he decides who to free and who to blame.
Everybody won’t be treated all the same.
There’ll be a golden ladder reaching down.
When the man comes around.

–Johnny Cash, “When the Man Comes Around”

Recently I decided that, to further my design efforts, I really needed to have some of the classic indie RPGs around. That way I could play them and perhaps absorb some of the design lessons from those games. Plus, I could find out what everyone else has been raving about. I’ve read a number of these games, but that’s no substitute for playing them.

One of the games in the Happy Box of Goodness that I received from Indie Press Revolution was my very own copy of Dogs in the Vineyard. I tried running this when it first came out, and it just didn’t go well. Since then, I’ve gotten a better handle on the game, and I wanted to give it another shot.

There are a couple of reasons for this. First was my designing Dirty Secrets and really absorbing the noir detective genre. Along the way, Ron commented to me that Dogs in the Vineyard was a direct descendant of Trollbabe, which was directly inspired by Ross MacDonald’s crime fiction. (I discuss some of this here.) The lightbulb went on in my head. Dogs in the Vineyard isn’t a Western game; it’s a noir game.

The second reason was my realization that, without polygamy, the Faith in Dogs in the Vineyard is just a conversative Christian-ish religion. I’m a conservative Christian. Many of the values put forth by the Faith are ones to which I’m sympathetic. The Faithful are my people.

Suddenly, Dogs in the Vineyard ceased to be a fantasy game about mystical paladin gunslingers. Instead, it became a noir game, set in my home religion, about issues that lie close to home for me.

Awesome.

So, I’m going to create towns of the Faithful, each with their dark noir-style secrets that need to be revealed and addressed. And then, we’re going to take idealistic, barely mature young people, armed with guns, Bibles and a couple months training, and set them loose on these nasty, dark, complicated situations.

Even more awesome.

Selling Gabrielle on this was easy. She had good memories of our previous go at Dogs in the Vineyard, and she was willing to try again. Crystal…well, she tried it again because she loves me. I assured her that I was confident that this would be a better experience than before.

Boy, was I right.

Dramatis Personae

Gabrielle played Brother Daniel Brooks, an honest farmboy who grew up in the Faith. He’s armed with his daddy’s shotgun and all his daddy’s wisdom. He has a girl back home who he’s going to marry when he gets back from being a Dog. Well, they aren’t exactly engaged or anything, but there’s always been an understanding between his family and hers. You know what I mean?

Acuity: 3d6
Body: 3d6
Heart: 4d6
Will: 3d6

Traits
Honest Face 3d6
Been shootin’ for years 3d8
Good old fashioned farmboy 1d10
Carryin’ all my daddy’s wisdom 2d10
I’m a Dog 1d8
“That just ain’t right” 1d6

Relationships
My daddy 1d6
Temperance James 1d8
Self-righteous 1d6

In contrast, Crystal played Sister Content Green. Her original name was Hazel, but her teachers at the Dogs’ Temple renamed her at her request. Her past is murky. She’s a relatively new convert with a dark past. Crystal knew some of the details of this dark past going into the game, but we’re elaborating as we go.

Oh, I should note that Crystal actually drew her Dog with her coat, including all the symbolism of the design. Content made her own coat; she didn’t have a town to back her up.

Acuity: 2d6
Body: 5d6
Heart: 3d6
Will: 5d6

Traits
Violent temper 2d10
Brutally honest 1d6
Fanatically faithful 1d6
Fearsome fist 4d4
Not totally alone 1d6

Relationships
I’m a Dog 2d4
Domestic Abuse 2d6

I was the GM, so that means I played the town.

Snowy Canyon

Town creation is brilliant. I hate doing game prep, so any tools that make it focused and simple are immediately my friends. Town creation is all that and more. I said it once, and I’ll say it again: town creation is the genius of this game, even more than the dice system. Yeah, it’s that good.

For those interested, here’s the town:

Snowy Canyon

Townspeople
Dorothy McCullen
Elias McCullen
Keziah McCullen
Lavina Culver
Aaron Culver
David Cooper
Abiah Cooper

Pride
Elias wants a child of his own. Keziah is Dorothy’s from when she was a whore, and so she doesn’t quite count. However, they haven’t been able to get pregnant.

Injustice
Elias obsesses about this lack, leading him to neglect Dorothy and Keziah.

Sin
Elias pays David to impregnate Dorothy. Both Dorothy and Abiah (David’s wife) agree, at least at first.

Demonic Attacks
Dorothy gets pregnant with twins, and Lavina (midwife and wife of the Steward) finds out the identity of the father

What do the townspeople want from the Dogs?
Dorothy McCullen—make Elias love her
Elias McCullen—bless the birth as legitimate
Keziah McCullen—be allowed to live alone with her mother like they used to
Lavina Culver—just move on without messing anything up
Aaron Culver—mediate the Cooper/McCullen feud
David Cooper—be able to divorce Abiah and marry Dorothy
Abiah Cooper—be given custody of the twins

What do the demons want?
Destroy both families over this issue

What do the demons want from the Dogs?
Side with either the McCullens or Coopers

What would happen if the Dogs didn’t come?
Abiah would murder Dorothy after she gives birth and would kidnap the children.

In looking this over, I think that I skipped a couple of steps. It’s arguable if I should have pushed the situation down to False Doctrine and Corrupt Worship. The “what if the Dogs didn’t come” doesn’t really take False Priesthood into account, either. Doesn’t really matter, though. It all worked out well.

What Happened in Snowy Canyon

The wind was whipping down the canyon as the Dogs rode into town. We established that the town was laid out like a West Virginian “holler”, with the town mostly winding along by the river that cut the canyon that the town lies in. So the Dogs went looking for the meeting house to find the Steward, Aaron Culver.

Both Crystal and Gabrielle established their characters fairly quickly. Brother Daniel was pretty laid back, using his folksy charm to ease into the situation. Sister Content started grilling the Steward immediately, looking for any sign of infractions. Somehow, Daniel managed to calm the situation and get everything moving towards the Steward’s house.

After dinner, Aaron started spilling his concern to Daniel about the McCullen and Cooper families, who had been feuding for the last six months or so. Content was helping his wife, Lavina, clear up from dinner, so she was only partially in the conversation. However, Lavina pulled Content aside and tried to persuade her that Aaron was blowing things out of proportion and that everything would blow over soon. I told Crystal, “She’s lying”. That’s all it took. Content accused Lavina of being a liar. We went to dice to figure out if Content could get the information out of Lavina. Eventually, Lavina confessed that she knew that David was the father of Dorothy’s babies.

Did Content share this information with Daniel? Of course not! So, early on, the Dogs were split up, which was actually quite cool.

The next morning, Daniel went to question Elias, while Content went to talk to Dorothy. There was some interesting crossing of scenes. Daniel and Elias were in one room, while Content and Dorothy were in another room. We played through Daniel’s conversation; when he finished with Elias, he left through the front door, politely taking his leave of the women who were there.

However, as we played out the other scene, we discovered that he had actually accidentally walked through a fairly intense conversation. Content confronted Dorothy about the babies’ true father, and we went to dice to see if Dorothy would actually confess. I rolled pretty well for Dorothy, and it looked like Crystal would have to escalate to get the information. But then we had this exchange. It went something like this:

CONTENT: What will you do if the children have red hair? (referring to David)
DOROTHY: I don’t know what you’re talking about. And, even if they did, what do you want me to do? Kill them?
CONTENT: I did. I couldn’t stand the idea that he would look like my father.

Gabrielle and I blinked at Crystal. I looked at my amazing dice, and I Gave on the spot.

Dorothy spilled everything, how Elias paid David to impregnate her. She looks up at Content and says, “At least, before, they paid [i]me[/i] money. But now we pay? What kind of messed-up religion is this?”

Meanwhile, Daniel had gone next door to question David and Abiah. David was gone on a business trip, but a very uptight, angry Abiah was there to greet Daniel. She didn’t really want to have a conversation with him, and she was about to enforce that with the loaded shotgun that she kept near the door. We played this as two conflicts. The first was “Does Abiah get David to leave?” and the second was “Does Abiah give up her part in the deal?” Daniel won the first conflict by suggesting that they move down to the meeting house to satisfy Abiah’s sense of propriety. Since we agreed that the stakes meant “Does Abiah manage to break off the conversation?” this satisfied all of us. So, down to the meeting house, where Daniel continued to press for information.

Things weren’t going well for Abiah, so she escalated very quickly to gunfighting. She raised the shotgun, and, when Daniel wouldn’t back down, she pulled the trigger.

At this point, I explained Gabrielle’s options to her. She didn’t have the necessary dice to Block, so she would either have to take the Fallout (3d10, in this case) and take the shot, or she would have to Give to block. She decided that the information was important enough that she didn’t want to give. So she took the Fallout, and Daniel was shot.

We introduced Content into the scene, giving Gabrielle a 1d8 Belonging die for Content’s intervention. Daniel Raises with, “I’m a Dog. I have the authority to ask these questions.” That was enough to force Abiah to Give. “My husband is a bastard,” she hisses.

Before the rest of the data dump, though, it’s time to roll Fallout!

Gabrielle rolls a 20.

We all blink at it. I say, “Daniel is dead.”

I nearly said, “Just reroll that.” But I firmly clamped down on that impulse. Gabrielle knew the risk; she had chosen this.

We worked it out. Content moves closer to Abiah, as she lays out what David has done. Daniel sits down on one of the benches, like he’s tired. Content hears what Abiah has to say, then turns to Daniel. “What do you think?” she says.

Daniel slumps and falls to the floor.

The shotgun clatters to the floor as Abiah turns to run.

Content dashes to Daniel’s side. If this were the movie, all the sound would have gone away. Just like Daniel. There he lies, clutching his beloved’s handkerchief.

Heavy stuff, mostly because it was so unexpected. A bolt from the blue.

They buried Daniel in the local graveyard. Content scattered consecrated earth on the grave before they buried him. Then someone came running from the McCullen’s house. Dorothy is in labor.

And a man rolls into town on a wagon. David Cooper is home.

(to be continued)

Another interview with me

Filed under: Roleplaying Games — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 5:01 pm

I was interviewed at GenCon by the guys from Canon Puncture about setting creation. This has finally become available on the Net here. The conversation starts around 15:53. I really appreciated the opportunity to be able to talk to Chris and Rich. Plus they bought the pizza, which was amazingly cool of them.

So, thanks guys!

(Once again, I think that I’m talking too quickly.)

December 28, 2007

An impudent meditation on the pagan roots of Christmas

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 5:20 pm

It’s that time of the year again. The snow is falling, the bells are ringing, and the Internet is buzzing with arguments about the pagan origins of Christmas. The claim is that Christians stole a winter celebration from the pagans, suppressing their religion and turning the celebration into a Christian celebration worshiping Jesus.

There are a number of possible responses to this line of argumentation. This article is one of them, approaching the discussion in a rational, scholarly fashion. Good for him!

That’s not how I’m answering. Instead, here’s my response to the claim that Christians stole Christmas from you.

So what?

For the sake of the argument, let’s grant that you’re right. So what? Christianity is in the process of spreading the kingdom of God across the entire world. By the time we’re done, we won’t just own Christmas and Easter.

We will own it all.

Just so we’re all clear on that.

Merry Christmas, everyone!

December 26, 2007

A glorious reality

Filed under: Thoughts About My Life, Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 4:00 pm

One of my best friends moved today. He’s leaving this area and moving to Tennessee. I think that it’s the right thing for him to do, but that doesn’t make it hurt less.

Have you ever considered how distance is an expression of death to us? Separation, loneliness, these are a foretaste of the final death that awaits this cursed creation.

But consider Jesus. Ever notice how, after His resurrection, He just appeared places. (e.g. Luke 24:36) Locked doors, long distances, none of that seemed to matter. He just wanted to be somewhere, and there He was.

This was an expression of His divinity. As 1 Corinthians 15:20 says, Jesus was the “firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep”. Jesus has the same sort of body that we will have. So I believe that we will also simply…be…places. No more travel times. No more Interstateland. Just the joy of being where you ought to be.

There will never again be a friend who is too far away, for no one will be too far away. Distance will no longer divide us, and we will have an eternity to be together.

Most assuredly, this world is fading away. Grasp it with both hands, and it slips through your fingers, leaving nothing but emptiness. And yet, Jesus has entered this fading world and has planted within it the seeds of something new. Something permanent. Something glorious.

Us.

“For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now. And not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.” (Romans 8:20-23)

A bitter reality

Filed under: Thoughts About My Life, Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 10:46 am

One of my best friends is moving today. He’s leaving this area and moving to Tennessee. I think that it’s the right thing for him to do, but that doesn’t make it hurt less.

Have you ever considered the sorrow under which we labor? The only way to keep your heart safe is to close it off, keep it safe from others. If you cannot be touched, you cannot be hurt. But if you cannot be touched, you also cannot love and be loved. Those who keep themselves aloof from others are the most miserable of all humans. But, everything in this world that we might love we will most assuredly lose. Everything that we touch turns to dust while we watch. Grasp it with both hands, and it slips through your fingers, leaving nothing but emptiness.

Truly, the Preacher spoke aright: “Consider the work of God: who can make straight what He has made crooked?” (Ecclesiastes 7:13)

“For the creation was subjected to futility….”(Romans 8:20a)

(to be continued)

December 24, 2007

Kaldormer heretic

Filed under: Thoughts About My Life — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 10:58 am

On Saturday, we made kaldormer for Christmas Eve dinner. This year, we…uh, well, *I* came up with an innovation. Rather than browning the kaldormer in a skillet, I used the deep fryer. Did it work? I’ll let you know after tonight….

December 23, 2007

O Come, O Come Emmanuel (redux)

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 12:21 pm

From http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0374.html:

According to Professor Robert Greenberg of the San Francisco Conservatory of Music, the Benedictine monks arranged these antiphons with a definite purpose. If one starts with the last title and takes the first letter of each one - Emmanuel, Rex, Oriens, Clavis, Radix, Adonai, Sapientia - the Latin words ero cras are formed, meaning, “Tomorrow, I will come.” Therefore, the Lord Jesus, whose coming we have prepared for in Advent and whom we have addressed in these seven Messianic titles, now speaks to us, “Tomorrow, I will come.” So the “O Antiphons” not only bring intensity to our Advent preparation, but bring it to a joyful conclusion.

But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. (2 Peter 3:8-9)

Even so, come Lord Jesus.

Amen.

Antiphon, December 23 (O Emmanuel)

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 8:15 am

O Emmanuel, God with us,
Our King and Lawgiver,
the expected of the nations and their Saviour:

Come

to save us, O Lord our God. Amen.

O Emmanuel,
Rex et legisfer noster,
expectatio gentium, et Salvator erum:

veni

ad salvandum nos, Domine Deus noster.

December 22, 2007

A quote on being American

Filed under: Quotes and Whatnot, Politics — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 2:31 pm

“If there be one principle more deeply rooted than any other in the mind of every American, it is, that we should have nothing to do with conquest.”—Thomas Jefferson

Antiphon, December 22 (O Rex gentium)

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 8:15 am

O King of the Gentiles and their desired One,
the Cornerstone that makes both one:

Come,

and deliver man,
whom you formed out of the dust of the earth.
Amen.


O Rex gentium, et desideratus earum,
lapisque angularis, qui facis utraque unem:

veni,

et salva hominem,
quem de limo formasti.

December 21, 2007

A public service, to those considering waterboarding

Filed under: Links, Politics — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 2:31 pm

5 Myths About Torture and Truth

So the CIA did indeed torture Abu Zubaida, the first al-Qaeda terrorist suspect to have been waterboarded. So says John Kiriakou, the first former CIA employee directly involved in the questioning of “high-value” al-Qaeda detainees to speak out publicly. He minced no words last week in calling the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques” what they are.

But did they work? Torture’s defenders, including the wannabe tough guys who write Fox’s “24,” insist that the rough stuff gets results. “It was like flipping a switch,” said Kiriakou about Abu Zubaida’s response to being waterboarded. But the al-Qaeda operative’s confessions — descriptions of fantastic plots from a man who intelligence analysts were convinced was mentally ill — probably didn’t give the CIA any actionable intelligence. Of course, we may never know the whole truth, since the CIA destroyed the videotapes of Abu Zubaida’s interrogation. But here are some other myths that are bound to come up as the debate over torture rages on.

Mission to Suburbia

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality, Links — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 10:42 am

I came across this site, which is a collection of resources on being missionaries in American suburbia. I’ve looked at exactly none of it, but I thought that I would bring this to the attention of my ‘burb-dwelling brethren for their further edification.

(This came from a link from this post, which I found by following a link from the Baylyblog.)

Antiphon, December 21 (O Oriens)

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 8:15 am

O Dawn of the East,
Brightness of light eternal,
And Sun of Justice:

Come,

And enlighten those who sit in darkness
And in the shadow of death.
Amen.

O Oriens,
splendor lucis aeternae,
et sol justitiae:

veni,

et illumina sedentis in tenebris,
et umbra mortis.

December 20, 2007

Antiphon, December 20 (O Clavis David)

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 8:15 am

O Key of David, And Sceptre of the House of Israel,
Who opens and no man shuts, Who shuts and no man opens:

Come,

And bring forth the captive from his prison,
He who sits in darkness and in the shadow of death.
Amen.

O Clavis David, et sceptrum domus Israel:
qui aperis, et nemo claudit; claudis, et nemo aperit:

veni

et educ vinctum de domo carceris,
sedentem in tenebris, et umbra mortis.

December 19, 2007

Antiphon, December 19 (O Radix Jesse)

Filed under: Theology and Spirituality — Seth Ben-Ezra @ 8:15 am

O Root of Jesse,
that stands for an ensign of the people,
before whom the kings keep silence and unto whom the Gentiles shall make supplication:

Come,

to deliver us, and tarry not.
Amen.

O Radix Jesse,
qui stas in signum populorum, s
uper quem continebunt reges os suum, quem gentes deprecabuntur;

veni

ad liberandum nos, iam noli tardere.

Next Page »
Proudly powered by wordpress wordpress-mu-1.2.1