The other two questions from the interview I mentioned have been posted.
Just a quiet corner of the Net where I will come to sit and think and write. Maybe you will find that I have something worthwhile to say.
The other two questions from the interview I mentioned have been posted.
Mike Miller (not to be confused with Michael S. Miller) interviewed me for his new interview blog 3 (or so) questions. My answers were long, so they are going up in installments. The first one is here.
I came across this video yesterday. He’s talking about indie video games, but I think it applies to all forms of independent art. Quality is quality, regardless of how many people worked on a project. And, yeah, giving something a pass just because it’s “indie” doesn’t actually help the independent artist. So, yeah, if you don’t have the money to make a blockbuster, then don’t try! All you’ll do is make a bad blockbuster. Instead, make a small film…but do it well.
I was reminded of this article today, so I thought I’d share:
It’s a brief discussion of game design in the style of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. Very funny, and very true.
My son Samuel has big ambitions. He dreams up large projects and then shops around for people to help him. It’s a good thing that his mother is as crazy as he is.
And so, the latest result of this insanity: Samuel’s Goodies. Currently, Samuel has one video online about making snickerdoodles. I know that I’m biased and all, but they were really good. So, if you want to see how it’s done, check out Samuel’s Goodies.
A couple weeks ago, Gabrielle and Raquel played Showdown, my current game-in-development. They were so taken with the story they created that Gabrielle actually wrote it up and posted it on her blog. It’s in several parts, which you can find here:
The story doesn’t show the actual game mechanics in use, but it does give a sense of the kind of story that the game produces.
I still need beta testers. If you’re interested, leave a comment!
Down in comments, Lance wrote:
I didn’t know what he was talking about, so I went poking.
And I found this: Being Poor
In this comment, Barb asked a question:
It’s been a while since she asked the question. In fact, I started writing this post on January 6, 2009. I’m only posting it now. That’s a long time. So long that I’ve changed the name of the game to
Major Crimes. But I digress. The question still deserves an answer.
So, yeah, why would I do this to myself?
First, for the uninitiated, here are some links:
I really like the Crash trailer, by the way. The bit at the end where the guy laughs about “people”…it just seems to sum up the movie so well.
And hey, while we’re here, a few clips from The Wire, so as you can get a feel for the show. FYI, these clips do including the use of language, so You Have Been Warned.
And, one of the conflicted, tragic characters of the show…Bodie. Yeah, spoilers and such:
Of course, the last two clips are from Season 4, when you’ve almost forgotten that Bodie killed Wallace. Almost….
But hey, this isn’t supposed to be a fanboy post about The Wire. Or Traffic or Crash, for that matter. Rather, I’m supposed to answer the question, “Why are you a fan of these stories?” And, for that matter, why make a game about making these kinds of stories?
First off, these stories are about specific social issues of our day. Traffic is about the effects of the drug war on society, Crash is about the impact of racism on society, and The Wire…well, The Wire is about the failure of social institutions.
In other words, these stories are trying to show the human cost and individual impact of social issues. So, we’re not just talking about “drug addiction” in Traffic; we’re talking about Caroline Wakefield, the daughter of a rich and powerful man who ends up prostituting herself for another high. We’re not just talking about “gang violence” in The Wire; we’re talking about Bodie, a generally motivated kid who fights a losing battle, long after his gang has abandoned him. We’re not talking about “institutional racism”; we’re talking about Officer John Ryan, who first sexually harasses a black woman and then later ends up saving her.
Beyond that, these stories all share a basic philosophy: we are all connected. The choices that we make don’t just affect ourselves. They affect everyone, rippling out from us like waves in a pond.
Yet we rarely consider this simple fact. We are so self-absorbed that we don’t even care about how we are hurting others.
These issues matter to me quite a bit. I am tired of the rhetoric that surrounds these issues. Everyone seems to have a solution, but few care about the human cost of their choices. So, I want people to stop long enough to consider the consequences of their choices. Rather than chanting “Just say no to drugs!” and voting for more police and harsher jail sentences for drug trafficking, I want people to consider the causes that lead someone to become a drug dealer. Why would someone choose that life? Maybe if you understood that, you’d have a different solution.
Along the way, I’d love to deconstruct the American myth of the police. We somehow believe that the police can simultaneously protect us from all harm while preserving our rights. Or, you know, at least the “important” ones. (Yeah, I’ve written about this elsewhere.) As I watched The Wire, I was constantly impressed with the fact that the police officers were just regular guys. They got up and went to work. Sometimes they had a good day; sometimes they had a bad day. Ever make a mistake at work? Yeah, so did they.
And now I’m watching The Shield, which is based on a simple premise: it is impossible to erase crime without becoming a criminal. Depressing, eh? But this is the result of our expectations of the police. We want them to be all-powerful, but then we complain when they take the necessary steps to accomplish the unachievable goal that we set before them. I find myself veering between anger at the police for their actions and sympathy for the impossible expectations that we have established for them.
Maybe more people should watch The Wire and The Shield instead of the quasi-magical CSI.
Once again, I digress.
I make games about issues that I think are important. I enjoy playing games that are just for fun, but I design games that express my concerns. I think that our world would be improved by more people stopping and thinking about these issues. Why do we continue to fund the drug war? What’s so bad about crack? Is the security that we have gained from new police techniques worth the freedom that we have lost?
I have my own answers. But I’m not writing Major Crimes to force my opinions on you. I’m writing Major Crimes, because I want you to have to answer these questions.
(Barb, you might also find “Why I Hate Fun” an interesting read. The author defends the idea of emotionally tumultuous stories being “fun”. Sorry for taking so long to write this for you.)
First, watch this video. Go ahead.
Kinda pretty, isn’t it? Yeah, I like that.
Funny thing is that, before yesterday, I had no idea that there was formal glowstick dancing. You know, beyond just jumping around at a rave with a glowstick. But as a form of expression? Not even a little bit.
Also, I’ll bet that none of the people in that video are roleplayers. And that’s the point right there.
The world is full of wonderful human activities. People do the most amazing things, which are beautiful and delightful, which will be ignored by most people in the world. Glowsticking. Street luge (with a hat tip to Ben Lehman’s XXXXtreme Street Luge). Roleplaying.
And yet roleplayers persist in trying to claw for the mainstream, waiting for that one game which will come along and give us mainstream cred. Because, somehow, when that happens, we’ll all feel like we have permission to enjoy this quirky activity that we call roleplaying.
Glowsticking will never be mainstream, but that doesn’t seem to matter to the dancers in that video. Instead, they are simply embracing that which they love; whoever shows up will be included.
Maybe roleplayers should just focus on embracing that which they love, not on demanding recognition from the mainstream.
I think I’m going to watch that video again.
So, some happy news for me!
Many years ago, I heard the album The City by Vangelis. (For those of you who don’t know, he’s the musician responsible for the soundtracks for Chariots of Fire and Blade Runner.) Derf Hopsecger, a friend of mine, owned it and would let me borrow it from time to time. It was a musical rendition of a day in the life of a city, from sunrise to nightfall.
I loved that album.
So I set out to locate it for myself.
I’ve been looking for years. For years. Like, I think that I’ve been looking for the last twelve years. Maybe longer.
Today, I located it on Amazon. No, it wasn’t there before. I’ve looked.
And now, it is mine.
Anna Kreider is still hard at work on Showdown art. In this blog post, Anna shows off her work so far on the Showdown cover. I like it!
Because all things zombie are cool, I present you with Zombie Attack, a book written by my son Samuel and illustrated by him and his older brother Isaac. (Just to be clear, Isaac is nine years old, and Samuel is almost eight.)
Samuel wrote the text by himself, spelling phonetically, which is really too bad, because English is a dumb language. He and Isaac then created all the images for the book using Microsoft Paint. Then Crystal went through the text with him, showing him the proper spelling of all the different words.
And now it is available for your purchasing pleasure. So, if the idea of buying of buying a book where the protagonist throws “millions of nunchuks” at zombies is appealing to you, click here.